The IdeoSphere
September 07, 2010, 08:29:26 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: So, what's the future of this forum going to be?  We're discussing it in the top forum -- join and and give us your take.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: UFOs, Aliens, DMT Imps etc.  (Read 2710 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Isis
Guest
« Reply #15 on: June 19, 2005, 07:02:32 PM »

Yes, I used my old saucer license photo.

There you go. What were you flying back in time?

 

I know, they are silver.


I can agree with that. That let's anosognosia off the hook. 

Logged
monkey
Guest
« Reply #16 on: June 21, 2005, 03:50:15 AM »

I think the little green men probably reside in the probability matrix or aether as our potential future selves.

So some say. I doubt that.
And they are not green.

     I used "little green men" as a figure of speech.  To clarify:  they appeared to me as like silvery, moon-light-colored outlines...and one of the buggers I saw was far from little - it easily peered into my 2nd floor bedroom window.
     Not that doubt isn't generally useful, but what do you suggest as their, uh, function? 
« Last Edit: June 21, 2005, 03:58:07 AM by monkey » Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #17 on: June 22, 2005, 06:02:03 AM »



     I used "little green men" as a figure of speech.  To clarify:  they appeared to me as like silvery, moon-light-colored outlines...and one of the buggers I saw was far from little - it easily peered into my 2nd floor bedroom window.
     Not that doubt isn't generally useful, but what do you suggest as their, uh, function? 


I had one time peering something into my room that high, but I also had a huge piece of spacecake.
And it was pretty hmmm looking like a giant dwarf?

Functions of the little silvers ? No idea. I haven't asked them.
I assume they are manifestations/symbols of a certain mindinfluence
and do come purely from a group of human minds. Advanced group of minds,
that broadcast on telepathy.
With other words I hold the option that the whole UFO
experience in various states by various people is a mental experiment.
But not one from the government, so I don't have a conspiracy theory,
rather the contrary.
May be to weird of an idea? Can be.



By the way have you see Arons webpage? http://ummo.cc/
He translated the Goethia purely into UFO realm.
Kind of interesting.
Logged
jamadara
Guest
« Reply #18 on: June 22, 2005, 10:53:17 AM »

I assume they are manifestations/symbols of a certain mindinfluence
and do come purely from a group of human minds. Advanced group of minds,
that broadcast on telepathy.

Reminded me of Blackmore's "Alien Abductions, Sleep Paralysis and the Temporal Lobe".
Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #19 on: June 22, 2005, 08:20:46 PM »

I assume they are manifestations/symbols of a certain mindinfluence
and do come purely from a group of human minds. Advanced group of minds,
that broadcast on telepathy.

Reminded me of Blackmore's "Alien Abductions, Sleep Paralysis and the Temporal Lobe".

 Frankenstein Persinger.... the present God of the Brain !


Still I don't believe in abductions either,  but I also don't believe in sleep paralysis as explanation. I think it is highly overrated and most people can stop that phenomena once they are told what it is.

So what is the phenomena, that is reported by so many so far.
The experiences are very vivid in some.
Is it for real? Or a result of a certain brainstate?
For the rest just another meme doing it's thing? Originated from a comic book of the 30ties?
Well if so, AC can beat that, because he had his vision I think in 1907.
Many minds in sync?
After all a conspiracy?
The alien in us?
A hype? More then 50 years?
Or is it a vehicle/form of a message?
We definetly need that chatbot.


Logged
jamadara
Guest
« Reply #20 on: June 23, 2005, 12:00:50 AM »

Still I don't believe in abductions either,  but I also don't believe in sleep paralysis as explanation. I think it is highly overrated and most people can stop that phenomena once they are told what it is.

I don't think it stands as a comprehensive explanation, but I would not dismiss it so quickly, either. Some similarities between abductions and OBEs seem pretty obvious to me, and some of TLI's research supports the theory that OBEs are (sic) caused by lucid dreaming -/ sleep paralysis (http://lucidity.com/NL32.OBEandLD.html, eg). Also, cf Old Hag Syndrome as sleep paralysis, and then replace the culture/context-sensitive conceptions of old hag (or night-mare) as bogeyman with gray alien as bogeyman. (See also "Alien abductions as a memeplex" from chapter 14 of Blackmore's _The Meme Machine_, and her [not too distantly related, I suspect] "Near-Death Experiences: In or out of the body?".)

I wonder if sombunall people prone to lucid dreaming -/ sleep "disorders" maybe also prone to waking trance states, hallucinations, -/ something similar.

I have not completely ruled out that all this abduction hubbub is (sic) just what it says it is (sic). [shrugs]
Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #21 on: June 23, 2005, 03:56:48 PM »

Jamadara:

I wonder if you as chaoist can define and defend the idea of disorder?  LOL

If sleep paralysis is the cause, how come that not every sleepparalysis ends up in an
abduction-experience? Actually most don't.
In many of those experiences sleep paralysis may be an ingrediant, but does that mean we have to jump to conclusions?

And if OBE is so similar to the abductionexperience, how come that an OBE can be willed and
an abduction experience cannot?
How come that many people induce an OBE from hypnagogic state or from waking dreaming and lucid dreaming
is not part of the process at all?
How come that OBE is also part of the shok in many trauma and called dissociation?
And in all those states nobody leaves the body. It is a just a description of the experience. 
And what else would lucid dreaming be then just the normal awareness then you have all day of your environment
and the content of your mindspace?

When you sleep and dream lucid only the awareness to the external gets diminished, but  the awareness gets already blocked/tunneld when you have high focus, or experience deeper form of trance.
It is said that when you dream you mostly don't have awareness, but if you don't have it, how can you ever remember a dream?
What I am saying is that by now the spindoctors have created so many categories and dots that they loose sight of
the fact that mind and awareness are fluid and that there is basically just one state of mind: awareness.
Even in deep sleep. Because if you don't have awareness even then,  I could never wake you up.
Try Tibetan dreamyoga for a while and see if you can be lucid during deep sleep. It is possible.
What I do as psychnonaut is nothing but travelling through the many possibilities my awareness has
and doing that creates an awareness of awareness. 
So best one can do is creating a map of that very awareness.

                                            /             awareness of awareness  the Eye   \
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                   
                                                                 Awareness   the I (I)s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        /                              / \                                  \
                                       /internal 1/10               O                 9/10  external\
                                                 
                                     / standbye 2/10                                  8/10 conscious\
                                    /internal dialogue 3/10                           7/10 comscious\
                                   / high focus 4/10                                     6/10  concious\
                                  / thoughtcreation/imagining/intuition 5/10     5/10  conscious\                                                                     
                                 /waking dream/trance/gnosis/psychosis 6/10     4/10 conscious\
                                /lucid dream/OBE  7/10                                   3/10 conscious\
                               /dream /hallucination/deep trance 8/10                 2/10 standbye \
                              /deep sleep/samadhi  9/10                                   1/10 standbye \
             ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           subconscious awareness /memory
                                                              body         awareness/memory
 


Or any other map that pleases you. Be creative.  What I want to show with my temporary map is nothing then the possibility, that our total awareness comes not always evenly dispatched in the area of the external reality or the internal reality and that awareness regarding our internal reality adjusts whenever it needs to that.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2005, 05:09:26 PM by Isis » Logged
jamadara
Guest
« Reply #22 on: June 23, 2005, 04:56:58 PM »

I wonder if you as chaoist can define and defend the idea of disorder?  LOL

I'm not a chaoist; I just enjoy their company. Smiley

Quote
If sleep paralysis is the cause, how come that not every sleepparalysis ends up in an
abduction-experience? Actually most don't.

Agreed. That's why I said I don't think it stands as a comprehensive explanation. What about the considerable % of people who have experienced abductions while driving down the street or otherwise engaged in (we assume) waking activity?

Quote
In many of those experiences sleep paralysis may be an ingrediant, but does that mean we have to jump to conclusions?

I don't think Susan, TLI, or I am jumping to conclusions. I think they recognised some trends, and I recognised that they recognised some trends.

Quote
And if OBE is so similar to the abductionexperience, how come that an OBE can be willed and
an abduction experience cannot?

Why do you assume that it can't? That it cannot be willed before witnesses may make good sleight-of-mind sense if you consider that belief in the objective existence of the abductors may be required to fuel the experience. It seems reasonable to me that the psychic censor might allow for OBEs to be willed from within while abductions are more commonly anticipated from without.

Quote
How come that many people induce an OBE from hypnagogic state or from waking dreaming and lucid dreaming
is not part of the process at all?

Again, I'm not sure that it isn't.

Quote
When you sleep and dream lucid only the awareness to the external gets diminished, but  the awareness gets already blocked/tunneld when you have high focus, or experience deeper form of trance.

I think I said something similar during class.

Quote
It is said that when you dream you mostly don't have awareness, but if you don't have it, how can you ever remember a dream?
What I am saying is that by now the spindoctors have created so many categories and dots that they loose sight of
the fact that mind and awareness are fluid and that there is basically just one state of mind: awareness.

I agree completely. TLI's forum has witnessed some of my arguments in favor of consciousness during (even non-lucid) dreams. I suspect all dreams require some level of consciousness, and that lucidity is just a another level/flavor/freq of that consciousness. But then I, like Joseph Campbell, think that flowers turning toward the sun is a kind of consciousness[1]. I would even go so far as to assert that all life requires consciousness--indeed, consciousness may funda-mentally be the stuff of life. I suspect humans are capable of unique impressions-/expressions of consciousness, but I do not think that consciousness is unique to humans any more than I think it is limited to common, waking activity.

Quote
Try Tibetan dreamyoga for a while and see if you can be lucid during deep sleep.

It's on my to-do list, but that list is pretty long and growing every day. Fortunately, there are others among me who have and will and are walking that path, so I don't have to (takes some of the pressure off to realize that I don't have to do everything in order for it to get done. Smiley)

Quote
So best one can do is creating a map of that very awareness.

There are many such maps, most written by people greater than I. So far, I am content to wander with only a hint of direction (purpose), taking in the dreamscape instead of schematizing it.

[Footnote 1: Alan Watts said something about flowers using humans to appreciate their beauty, that I find relevant to this, too, but I cannot recall the details, now.]

PS--Bad V-Prime, I know. My usual apologies.
Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #23 on: June 24, 2005, 06:12:02 PM »


I'm not a chaoist; I just enjoy their company. Smiley

That leaves you off the hook, but not around the corner.

Quote
Agreed. That's why I said I don't think it stands as a comprehensive explanation. What about the considerable % of people who have experienced abductions while driving down the street or otherwise engaged in (we assume) waking activity?

 I read numbers that 35 % of the American people believe in Aliens and in Extraterrestial visits.
In Susans article: 
Recent polls 4 millions abductees? Even if it is a gros overestimate like Susan says , what are we still talking. Half of it?
Two millions. That is a lot of people.
And if it is true what Susan also says, many abductees don't want to report or be researched, how can the above number be  an exageration?
Susan has difficulties to find subjects for her research and can get only 12 from the 24 in Britain?
What a difference in numbers.
What can I say? The Aliens must love Disney-Land a lot?
Is there a sleepparalysis epidemic going on and nobody noticing it and everybody who catched it  has seen the x-file the night before?   

Can't there really be any other option instead all those people are making something up, suffer from disorders or do dream.   
Is there just 1 different option:  that aliens must exist?
Or can there be something else? And if what could that be?

The creation of false memory is another idea: http://cms.psychologytoday.com/articles/index.php?term=PTO-20030527-000002

Point is also , none of the researchers researches cases that fall under your % .
No millions in those cases.


Quote
I don't think Susan, TLI, or I am jumping to conclusions. I think they recognised some trends, and I recognised that they recognised some trends.

I don't think you are, I think she is with her 12 subjects. I don't know about the TLI. 

From her article:
"The main alternative theory is that abductions are associated with sleep paralysis."
We have A , A is associated with B,  and now that is a main alternative theory? Shouldn't it say it leads to the conclusion that if A is present, one can highly expect B to be there too, specially if there is no witness, no other physical evidence
and the person has been in bed at the time of experience and was halfasleep?   

"In spite of the small sample, the results strongly support the suggestion that alien abductions are related to sleep paralysis and not to temporal lobe lability. "
"Of course an alternative is that real aliens are causing the increased sleep paralysis, and abductees’ belief in aliens is well founded. The better we understand the psychological origins of the experience the less likely that alternative becomes."

Can't help reading the conclusion or rather the suggestion : The experience has a psychological origin and is triggered by sleepparalysis.
 
By the way, a lot of drugexperiences have the UFO/alien theme too.
 

Quote
Why do you assume that it can't? That it cannot be willed before witnesses may make good sleight-of-mind sense if you consider that belief in the objective existence of the abductors may be required to fuel the experience. It seems reasonable to me that the psychic censor might allow for OBEs to be willed from within while abductions are more commonly anticipated from without.


Show me any report in which it has been willed. With or without witness.
There are none, at least none, that I have found.
I have found one in which someone experienced to be abducted in the presence of a journalist. 
Nothing unnormal appeared to the witness present, except that the person stopped communicating.   
May be Strieber did will it. I have always avoided to read Strieber. Saw the movie communion though.

Seems odd to me. At least if my observation is true to a great extent.
Because if it is a solemly internal experience as most "researchers" claim, part of a dreamstate, at least some people could be able to will it. Plenty of trained lucid dreamers out there who should be able to replicate that experience.
If they can morph into a bird, they could dream up some aliens, if they wanted.
So far I don't know about any that tried. May be you do.
Beliefs?  Considering the amount of people I have met at UFO convention just dying to become abducted , one could expect at  least a few willed or wished for abductions, if belief should be the main thing.
Nope the funny part is that it usually hits more non-believers then believers.

And maybe here goes belieftheory.
 

 
Quote
Footnote 1: Alan Watts said something about flowers using humans to appreciate their beauty, that I find relevant to this, too, but I cannot recall the details, now.]

An interesting angle. 
You may have noticed that humans do cut flowers because they appreaciate
their beauty. So what is the flower thinking? Hey I am going to use that human to get cut?
Like in anything better then those insects? Flowers massively avoiding sexual activities with bees?
 Now that was fun imagining.
 

Logged
monkey
Guest
« Reply #24 on: June 25, 2005, 04:07:02 AM »

     I think the phenomenon of seeing the little silvers fairly simple.  All the time people get bombarded with information which the so-called conscious mind tunes out.  So, one of the possibilities for someone whose real consciousness, or subconscious, becomes active has them possibly seeing "aliens".
     It seems hard to disentangle OBEs with "alien abduction accounts".  I think the difference lies mainly in the witness and how literally they take the experience.  Although in my experience the entities seemed benevolent and interested mostly in observing,  in many "alien abduction acounts" people felt menaced as the entities actively tried to experiment on them.  It seems like people who meet them in an OBE experience see them as "less solid", a different kind of material, than those who perceive them as abductors.  These and other considerations and synchronicities (such as reading the same theory that I had already pondered) lead me to hypothesize that they maybe latent aspects of the self.
Logged
jamadara
Guest
« Reply #25 on: June 25, 2005, 05:30:50 PM »

Isis,

Quote
Can't there really be any other option instead all those people are making something up, suffer from disorders or do dream.   
Is there just 1 different option:  that aliens must exist?
Or can there be something else? And if what could that be?

I could not agree more with your line of thinking, here. It resembles my biggest problem with Big Science, and speaks to my dissatisfaction with BS's treatment of subjective matters (ha!) as bogus, delusional, etc. One of the things I like about Susan's memetics is that it offers a science-friendly theory for why people believe all the various things they do, other than mass hysteria, etc. I dunno know if it's real-true or not, but I appreciate its initiative, rigor, and even some of its insights.

Still, I suspect subjectivity is at the heart of OBEs, alien abductions, leprechaun sightings, God, etc--I think the fact that millions of people have been abducted yet we still have nothing we collectively regard as "proof" (I don't subscribe to many conspiracy theories) maybe telling enough--and so it does not seem unreasonable to me that biochemical reactions that induce/influence/enhance/emphasize/etc subjective activity--such as trances, dreams, hypnagogic, etc--may have something to do with abduction experiences. And I suspect false memory is not far off from all that, either.

Quote
Show me any report in which it has been willed. With or without witness.
There are none, at least none, that I have found.
I have found one in which someone experienced to be abducted in the presence of a journalist.
Nothing unnormal appeared to the witness present, except that the person stopped communicating. 

That was kinda my point. Let us assume that AAEs (alien abduction experiences) require a higher degree of belief in their objective existences than OBEs (not  too difficult to suppose if we take into account the media-induced pressure to prove aliens--and conspiracies to hide them--exist). Let us also assume that most people do not think it is possible to will something into existence (magically), without good, ol' elbow-greasy hard work. It might not then occur to people who have AAEs that they can will them to happen. (Although... http://www.filecabi.net/v.php?file=ufoondemand.wmv.) People who can OBE at will might be so caught up in their astral planes that people-collecting spaceships seem to pass by them (but I suspect there exists a lot of people who believes in both OBEs and AAEs, as both have close proximity to a paranormal attractor).

Of course, this is all just conjecture based on my experience and intuiting what makes sense to me. I'm just saying that I don't feel that the fact that I can walk down to my favorite book store and acquire an OBE how-to book, but I cannot do the same for AAEs (I can, however, find several books containing dubious AAE evidence), implies the two are unrelated.

Quote
Nope the funny part is that it usually hits more non-believers then believers.

So do OBEs and lucid dreams. I have read several reports from people who experienced one or the other (or both) without having heard of it/them before, or who did not think such experiences were real.

Quote
Recent polls 4 millions abductees? Even if it is a gros overestimate like Susan says , what are we still talking. Half of it?
Two millions. That is a lot of people.
And if it is true what Susan also says, many abductees don't want to report or be researched, how can the above number be  an exageration?
Susan has difficulties to find subjects for her research and can get only 12 from the 24 in Britain?

How many people do you think have had at least one lucid dream in their lifetimes? Now, what % of that group do you think knocks on TLI's doors, wanting to be experimented on/with, or even replies to TLI's published calls for volunteer subjects and dream reports?

A girl once raved about her friends' psychic powers, and I asked, why don't your friends exhibit their extraordinary abilities to the satisfaction of some credible scientist so we can put the debate of whether such abilities exist or not behind us (really, I don't think it's that simple)? She said that they had no interest in being lab rats for BS (my paraphrase). So there we have it: the debate goes on.

Quote
You may have noticed that humans do cut flowers because they appreaciate
their beauty.

A practice I have discouraged my daughter from continuing. Humans destroy many things to get we want, and I suspect it is not so different than when a predator kills its prey to perpetuate itself. Appetite. Desire. Drive. I do not claim to comprehend the intricacies of such wonderful and terrible things, but I do suppose it is fortunate for us and other living things that in addition to desire, we also have forethought, compassion, and--perhaps most importantly--choice.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2005, 08:10:49 PM by jamadara » Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #26 on: June 25, 2005, 09:25:47 PM »

Jamadara,

Still, I suspect subjectivity is the key to understanding OBEs, alien abductions, leprechaun sightings, God, etc--I think the fact that millions of people have been abducted yet we still have nothing we collectively regard as "proof" (I don't subscribe to many conspiracy theories) maybe telling enough--and so it does not seem unreasonable to me that biochemical reactions that induce/influence/enhance/emphasize/etc subjective activity--such as trances, dreams, hypnagogic, etc--may have something to do with abduction experiences. And I suspect false memory is not far off from all that, either.

I agree with you that subjectivity is a hot key for many things. 
But do we  understand "subjectivity" and can accept it's diversity?
I don't think so. We slowly come to the discovery that subjectivity can be very different in humans while it is not exclusive to a pretty similar objectivity that is shared with others.
Simple example:
Not many people will disagree if they are in front of the same tree or a cube, but look what happens if they are in front of the same person.
You cannot really know, how huge the difference is until you have been exposed to a lot of people. Then you know for sure, it says little what people really think of you.
If you have that experience you become aware, that very little what you think you are, is actually experienced by others.
In fact under that kind of feedback it seems that you don't exist at all, and people fabricate a sort of existance of you to which they also respond. Works either way, negative or positive.
And amazingly those images are created in the very first seconds after you first meet someone.
From a certain point on you realize that hardly anybody see's you the way you experience yourself, those that come close are your friends and your loved ones.

It is a sad truth , but we do appear a lot of our lives as an unvoluntarily hologram in the subjectivity of others.
With magic as the only little control about those holograms.
It is none of our making, but our very existance evokes a response, imageforming in the mind of others. 
And so we become virtual realities in the minds of others. Everybody we meet. The more we meet, the more others agree  about ourselves , the more the hologram gets dense and therefore real. ( idols, heroes)
Some people adopt  and become the hologram they recognizes best and let go of most  internal definition of themselves. They fall in love with the mirrorimage others provide or get sucked into it.   
A illustration to...... subjectivity, I hope. Not that you need it, it just frustrates me, so I write it of my chest.
What we are is again another discussion.   

Now while I am fully open to an explanation of the UFO phenomena in the realms of the subjective,
which can be plenty as we are both aware, I don't want to dismiss an explanation in the realm of the objective and they come rare.

So far I have just two options in that realm:
1) real Aliens/UFOs
2) mindcontrol or more friendly mindinfluence

I practically regard the first for zero-chance.
The second I don't know.

First critic regarding that subject: Waha.... conspiracysyndrom .... get out of here...
Diving beyond:
It still seems odd that despite that the phenomena alien/ufo  is all over the world, we still can say,
that the USA and Southamerica is affected the most.
Susan had only 12 subjects in Britain. Hallejuyah.
In Britain for christ sakes, were they have ghosttourism?
The land of haunted houses and mediums?
If all those phenomena come down to suggestions and beliefs, that country should have a carpet of UFO's  in the sky
and Blair should by now confess that he is a puppet of alien influence and traumatised by multiple abductions.

What is my point you might be asking?
It is a point that I hardly don't want to belief at all, because it is outrageous in it's possibility. 
My point is that considering a certain locality of *most* phenomena
it can be possible that external mindinfluence is in the game. By whom or why I couldn't really say.
What also leads me into that direction of thinking are my own experiences in that regard,  pretty sequencial for years in dreams, reinforcing under drugs or in regressionexperiments , but stopping the very night I found human influence behind it in a dream.
All started after I "saw" a ufo pretty close real life, with a witness by the way. We are talking 1976 -1996.
Nothing special to tell about that one, except that it was huge, extreemly beautiful and orange, fiery with a dash of magenta glow.   
But in the 90ties I was already experienced in many different techniques and still had not a handle on this one.
I took it also mostly pretty cool by the way. All in all, those experiences never got priority regarding others.
Mostly found it odd that they kept repeating and had no control, but I never had any victim feelings or stuff,
I am too curious for that, besides I have no nightmares, because I see them for what they are, just a different sort of dream and as interesting as those who have a more comfortable script.       

Next if you translate the most common experiences into subconscious messages you might get something like this:
abduction: against will
sexual manipulation : mental manipulation
doctors room : research experiment
genetic manipulation: attempt of mental change
alien: unknown someone
ufo: technology

Most messages from the aliens : Don't mess with your planet anymore, create a mutation, love. Why would they have a mesage in the first place? Seems odd. 

And so on... oh well I just might have found a belief that banishes those experiences.
Should I turn it into money? 

But my point stays that they seem not to be able to be willed, which doesn't point towards a subjective experience.
What I am saying is that I am very willing to accept that I have caused all those experiences,
but while I know that I have caused a lot of other experiences that are similar intensive or strange, I don't still know about those.
I am also not afraid to demystify the experiences, in the contrary. I think it is kind of cool to find out what they really could be. Part of the fun.     

Quote
That was kinda my point.
Let us assume that AAEs (alien abduction experiences) require a higher degree of belief in their objective existences than OBEs (not  too difficult to suppose if we take into account the media-induced pressure to prove aliens--and conspiracies to hide them--exist). Let us also assume that most people do not think it is possible to will something into existence (magically), without good, ol' elbow-greasy hard work. It might not then occur to people who have AAEs that they can will them to happen.  People who can OBE at will might be so caught up in their astral planes that people-collecting spaceships seem to pass by them (but I suspect there exists a lot of people who believes in both OBEs and AAEs, as both have close proximity to a paranormal attractor).

Your link is not working.
Yeap. Also a very good point.
In my case that would be seeing an UFO, and after that recreating it, without the idea that it can.
Which of course I hadn't, because I had  years of atheist indoctrination behind my back, after catholic indoctrination
to complete the picture. I had no idea back then about anything really, as I was highly physical orientated.
My only gods were outragious guys and I think that I filled my time with worshipping them and founding a new religion
with any new god. Have you any idea how many gods walk on this planet?

Well joke aside, it still leaves the question why it only stopped after I found that the phenomena of human origin.
Was that my own? It can be.
However what I have seen has led me to the belief that the whole phenomena appears due to an occult/spiritual influence of a group of people. And it may have well started with Crowley, as Monkey once mentioned.   
Which kinds of relates to your caught in the astral plane idea, but from a different angle.
If that is true, as far I am concerned now: Happy abducting guys, I couldn't care less.

It mainly keeps the door open to external influence in this phenomena. 
 
 
Quote
Of course, this is all just conjecture based on my experience and intuiting what makes sense to me. I'm just saying that I don't feel that the fact that I can walk down to my favorite book store and acquire an OBE how-to book, but I cannot do the same for AAEs (I can, however, find several books containing dubious AAE evidence), implies the two are unrelated.

Yes. A valid point.
However you cannot get a how to AAE book, can you?
If get some good OBErs to replicate the AAE experience, I will be convinced.

Quote
Nope the funny part is that it usually hits more non-believers then believers.
Quote
So do OBEs and lucid dreams. I have read several reports from people who experienced one or the other (or both) without having heard of it/them before, or who did not think such experiences were real.

I see your point of mine being pointless.
I am not entirely convinced yet, because so far as I know most OBE experiences have been replicated by others. 

Quote
Recent polls 4 millions abductees? Even if it is a gros overestimate like Susan says , what are we still talking. Half of it?
Two millions. That is a lot of people.
And if it is true what Susan also says, many abductees don't want to report or be researched, how can the above number be  an exageration?
Susan has difficulties to find subjects for her research and can get only 12 from the 24 in Britain?

Quote
How many people do you think have had at least one lucid dream in their lifetimes? Now, what % of that group do you think knocks on TLI's doors, wanting to be experimented on/with, or even replies to TLI's published calls for volunteer subjects and dream reports?

No idea . Do they know? Or estimate?
I was pointing out the huge difference between American and British belief.

Quote
A girl once raved about her friends' psychic powers, and I asked, why don't your friends exhibit their extraordinary abilities to the satisfaction of some credible scientist so we can put the debate of whether such abilities exist or not behind us (really, I don't think it's that simple)? She said that they had no interest in being lab rats for BS (my paraphrase). So there we have it: the debate goes on.

Most psychic test boil down to reading cards upside down or stuff like that. They also involve inhibition of the natural senses. As psychism is an extension of those, what can one expect as result?  So far I have never read of a test of which I thought hmm that is pretty - real life like. So it is a waste of time really.
Besides psychism is highly unpredicatable. Like my rather stupid questions: Do you wear two earrings?
Because to me, it seems that you do. I hope you do, because otherwise I have to wonder what the little lights mean
on your ears, astrally I mean. 

Quote
You may have noticed that humans do cut flowers because they appreaciate
their beauty.

Quote
A practice I have discouraged my daughter from continuing. Humans destroy many things to get we want, and I suspect it is not so different than when a predator kills its prey to perpetuate itself. Appetite. Desire. Drive. I do not claim to comprehend the intricacies of such wonderful and terrible things, but I do suppose it is fortunate for us and other living things that in addition to desire, we also have forethought, compassion, and--perhaps most importantly--choice.

Which mirrors your integrity and consequence to a great extent. Sobriety -  one of Castaneda's better ideas.
However.... Flower even if they are cut are said to have the quality to absorb negative energy and emit positive.
They emit pure light. They are not for nothing used as offers in many temples. 
Also the flower is from the air-element of the plantkingdom. Their fragrance has powerfull qualities, as fragrance reaches the lymbic part of the brain.  I have brought Lotus from Egypt. They have found bottles of fragrances of Lotus in the tombs, that hadn't lost their qualities for over 1000 of years. Amazing isn't it?
Probably many flowers have lost their lifes for one of those bottles, but I will handle it as a treasure and do with it for the rest of my life. The magical quality of Lotusflower is enorm and highly protective. 
Now how is that for indulgence? I still feel guilty, but I couldn't resist !

Next watching the dying flower teaches us our own destiny and makes us more aware of our short time in life.   
Silverbear my teacher was a flowerman, he painted them and the little elfs to keep his spirit.
Must have helped, he died without suffering, despite his cancer, went easy as the wind. 
He always said it is the most beautiful thing on earth. Flowers teach also abundance,  some plants will even make more, if you cut them. He said that we are flowers really.
Ah, may be he was just a sentimental fool? 
So I hope that at times you allow your daughter to have some flowers in her room, because it inspires to flower herself.
Sorry had to bring across SB ideas here, I practically heard his voice. Maybe your daughter is highly sensitive or has an extreme sense of beauty. I wouldn't really know. But just reading about your daughter brings a swarm of images
of sunny days and fields with flowers, and SB teaching also medical herbs to her. So maybe she has a little plantperson
inside. I really don't know how to interpret those images.       
But all in all I agree with you here. It breaks my heart to see those beauties sold in supermarkets as if they had no value at all.
 
 






Logged
jamadara
Guest
« Reply #27 on: June 25, 2005, 11:04:39 PM »

As usual, Isis, you have pushed my limits. Thank you. Smiley

I wish to let this rest for a while, while I background-process it and proceed with other things, perhaps to return with some fresh perspective.

Quote
Besides psychism is highly unpredicatable. Like my rather stupid questions: Do you wear two earrings?
Because to me, it seems that you do. I hope you do, because otherwise I have to wonder what the little lights mean
on your ears, astrally I mean.

One 8g, captive-bead ring in each ear. Assuming you did not see them in an online photograph of me (not difficult to find, but I trust you), can you teach me how to do that?
Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #28 on: June 26, 2005, 02:46:18 PM »

As usual, Isis, you have pushed my limits. Thank you. Smiley

About pushing limits, you have done the same with me, as I had to question my beliefs again.
Conclusions: There is no way they can be stable.   

Quote
One 8g, captive-bead ring in each ear. Assuming you did not see them in an online photograph of me (not difficult to find, but I trust you), can you teach me how to do that?

I could have, if it is on your website. But as I recall it had only text. If it is there, I have it in my subconscious memory.
Game over. Next game.

I haven't seen "earrings", by the way.   
I have seen two little lights.
 Left brain has to translate right brain. Left brain came up with earrings, as most rational explanation
if any. Meaning that I have could easily interpreted different.
On the side,  believe me I am a terrible remote viewer.
 
 
My point was merily, that psychic information cannot be pinned down. Because the most weird information can come
and what rises beyond subliminal level is highly random.  Those that de-randomize to a great extent are the ones that are the excellent readers and they mostly are in one or two frequencies. 
But the random part is what makes tests difficult that involves neutral physical stuff like cards. Those inanimate things mostly don't provide enough of a psychic link for a reader, which works a bit like the magical link.   
 
Teach you?
Not remote viewing as singularity, as I work with the mental frame of an aura. But in that system there is part that covers that area a bit. 
But playing with psychic information is great fun and as I believe a lot easier to learn then lucid dreaming.   
When I am back from holiday I will start to put the system I have learned online, rewritten in the light of all that I have learned in addition. I also want to write a bit of a plug-in for the tech Pete has put into the world.
Too many systems out there pretending to be stand-alones.   
So not  all at once, as it needs translation, debugging and I need to find a way to crop the information and extend instructions.       
But in the process of that you can have a go whenever you want. 
For me it wold be great to have feedback if people can do anything with the mental frame and instructions.
Meaning the results.
 
 


   




Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!