The IdeoSphere
July 29, 2010, 03:18:45 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: So, what's the future of this forum going to be?  We're discussing it in the top forum -- join and and give us your take.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Googlemancy - What would Alice do?  (Read 1081 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Telarus, KSC
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130



View Profile WWW
« on: June 03, 2005, 09:20:39 PM »

Googlemancy - Image Alchemy.
Example:
Search term: "What would Alice do"



An excellent article about Googlemancy on Key 23:
Quote

  Spare also used his paintings and pictures as sigils. This approach to sigilization represents another important, although largely ignored breakthrough in advancement via deconstruction. The letter scramble approach creates an association between the statement of intent and the sigil itself for the magician in a very direct but limited way. Using a drawing, painting, or even a photograph as a sigil involves a more abstract and potentially more efficient way of creating the association between intent and sigil. Consider that the definition of an adept generally involves reaching a point where reality is the only symbol set required to work magick. Reality is precisely what is being examined through drawings, paintings and photographs. Learning to use these things as sigils breeds the mindset necessary for adepthood. This is where Spare has given the greatest gift to the modern magician; through deconstruction of ritual he created a sigilization process that trains the magician to become an adept directly. In essence, this is a shortcut to adepthood.

  Googlemancy is a term which is catching on in occult circles as quickly as its secular counterpart ‘googling’ is in the mainstream. Search engines offer us the ability to train our magickal consciousness using Spare’s framework. Though googlemancy is primarily seen as a divinatory process, it also has applications in enchantment and illumination. Using it to develop adept consciousness is a fairly simple process and starts off by mirroring the letter scramble approach to sigilization.

  The googlemancy approach to sigilization seems contrary to the bulk of material written about sigilization. Then again, the so-called empty handed approach of the adept also seems to run contrary to the bulk of literature written about magick. The statement of intent used in the letter scramble approach to sigils is usually at least one sentence in length and sometimes longer. In contrast, the google approach boils down the statement of intent to a single word, or at most a few words. This word is then entered into the image search function of google.

  The magician should scour the resulting images until they come across one that connects as being directly related to their statement of intent. This image is then charged as a sigil. Most image searches will bring up photographic hits as well as paintings or drawings. These photographic hits are the most useful for developing the adept consciousness, and for this reason I tend to refer to this process as image alchemy.


-=MORE=-

Recent discucsions in Maby Logic Academy have wondered what would happen once an AI servitor loose on the net runs across Googlemancy in a forum like this.
Text quoted to the 23 Apples of Eris Blog, from Key 23.

Logged
Defenestrator
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 71



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2005, 02:37:30 AM »

Thank you for the article -- the concept is really quite simple, but I hadn't thought of it before. I think it could be much more effective than the scrambled letter method.

I thought the Saruman/Tolkien castle image could be useful for something.

Logged
Isis
Guest
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2005, 10:49:31 PM »

http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-11/alternative.html

Neurobiological Bases for Magical Thinking
Of all the principles of magical thinking I discussed earlier, Frazer's principle of similarity is most basic. This is the basis for the universal and timeless beliefs and practices involving notions of resemblance, falling under the general rubric of "imitative magic," and the principle that has most persuaded scholars to suggest that a basic mechanism of human cognition may be at work. It has long been understood that imitation lies at the basis for learning among higher primates and humans. Specific brain mechanisms involved in imitation among monkeys have recently been identified, and their implications for primate and human perception, symbolism, communication, and action have been recognized (Rizzolatti and Arbib 1998). Therefore, a 1999 discovery among human subjects by brain scientists is especially exciting. Marco Iacoboni and his colleague (Iacoboni et al. 1999) asked healthy participants to observe pictures of specific finger movements, and to imitate those movements while their brain activity was measured; and later to move the appropriate finger when shown only pictures of simple cross marks spatially representing the fingers involved in the earlier movements. Their experiments showed that specific areas of the human brain are involved in imitation, both when the stimuli are actions and symbolic representations of actions. The implications for magical thinking are huge.


Logged
jamadara
Guest
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2005, 12:28:27 AM »

Thanks for the article, Isis. I have read some of Susan Blackmore's contributions to the CSICOP; interesting stuff (but then, I like Sue even though I sometimes disagree with her conclusions; I once initiated a comparison of her work to Sylvia Browne's, but it got ugly and did not end well).

That has not much to do with the topic; sorry.
Logged
scarecrow
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 28


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2005, 12:06:59 AM »

What's up Josh; couldn't help but notice your sig:

Evolutionary cybernetics studies the origin and development of purposeful organization in Nature, Mind, Society and Technology."—Principia Cybernetica Web

I thought...huh...so like a lot of fields of study, evolutionary cybernetics seeks to imitate and understand other systems in it's own fashion.  I keep thinking off Crowley (and a lot of people) saying, learn this subject in detail (for example the TOL) and you'll have a good understanding of a lot of different systems.

Patterns, man....patterns.  Imitations of patterns = diversity.
Logged
HYPOCRTRITE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2005, 12:00:16 AM »

Morphogenesis is what Sheldrake and Watson would have called it, for instance:

Sympaphetic Magick may get labelled Modelling or Patterning under NLP blasted parameters. It's the Monkey See Monkey Do Monkey Think Hypotheses. All humans do it, they model after each other.

Check out Rober O Becker's and Michael Persinger's websites for their theories on neurophysiology and temporeal lobe seizures and spiritual phanatasmagoria esp in lieu of Brain Entrainments and Cymatics and Biofeedbacks and Auto Genic Trainings. Whoooh.

Back onto Googlemancy this is the Nintendo Generation we are on about who charge sigils whilst playing electronic games (magick is all time) I find the Montage Method cool. Chaos blesss Burroughs a true shining star - true modern magickal pioneer and innovator.

Shi'ite sake (no moslem pun intended) I still use scissors for my collages boo hoo.

Whatever happpened to Alice she ended up in excellent Jeff Noon books of course and in "Resident Evil," as an AI con-struct hell-bent on Control and Domination. Still never grokkked the maths of Lewis Carroll, what was that the psychadelic monographicas of the magick mushroom and the hypernormalised mirror astral side to us all?!

Can someone give me a "stooopid" hat or what?

Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!